 |
It has long been thought that regular attendance at
religious services provides a spiritual background of support that
aids good health. Studies have shown that people who attend services
frequently have less anxiety, depression and substance abuse, lower
blood pressure, fewer strokes and fewer suicides than those who are
not so regular. It's not surprising, therefore, that a recent large
study of people over 65 from the Bible Belt in the USA showed prolonged
survival in those who were frequent attendees at church. [1]
The survey was done in subjects selected by Duke University researchers
as part of a project supported by the National Institute of Aging.
There were more black people (54%) in the survey population than
in the community, as the project was focused initially on ethnic
differences in aging.
Almost 4000 subjects were interviewed in their homes and gave information
on their religious attendance. Half of them came from rural and
half from urban communities. They were contacted for follow-up every
year, either by phone or in person. The study lasted just over six
years. Religious attendance was quite high - 53% of the participants
went to church weekly or more often. Over 95% of them were Judeo-Christian
(59% Baptist, 17% Methodist, 4% Presbyterian, 4% Pentecostal, and
11% other Protestant).
The survey collected information on when any of the participants
died, and possible influencing factors such as race, marital status,
number of years of education, ability to cope independently at home,
general health, depression, smoking and drinking, and any serious
family events (e.g. death of a close relative or spouse).
Analysis showed that people who went to church once or more a week
were more likely to be women, better educated and black. They were
also more likely to be married, have a large social network and
more friends. On the other hand, they were less likely to have chronic
health problems, disabilities, depression, or to smoke and drink.
Over the 6-year follow-up period frequent attendees were 46% less
likely to die than infrequent attendees. Even taking into account
all the possible confusing factors that might affect the results
(e.g. poor health or disability preventing attendance at church),
there was still a 28% improved survival in frequent attendees.
This study, like similar ones, raises more questions than it answers.
Obviously people with a strong faith will have good reasons, based
on their devotion, to accept that they are more likely to live longer
than " sinners". However, scientists like to try to find
the way in which faith can have such an effect.
The authors of the study report suggest several ways that regular,
frequent religious attendance may improve one's general health and
the outcome of a disease or serious health problem. For instance,
frequent attendees may, through their social network, be made aware
earlier about possible illnesses and preventive steps. Moreover,
churchgoers probably follow their doctor's advice more carefully.
Certainly, they have less depression and anxiety (which may be related
to favorable changes in the immune system), and lead healthier lifestyles
(e.g. less smoking, alcohol). However, in analyses that took these
factors into account, the effect of religious attendance persisted
to a significant degree - a 28% lesser chance of dying in the next
6 years.
One can only wonder what the results would have been if the study
had been done in other communities in the world. Would similar studies
in populations with other major religious beliefs (Judaism, Buddhism,
Islamism, Hinduism) produce similar results? Within Christianity,
would there be differences in results between Catholics and Protestants?
Clearly, there is still a lot to be learned about the beneficial
influences of faith on health.
Source
- Does religious attendance prolong survival? HG. Koenig, JC.
Hays, DB. Larson, Journals of Gerontology (Medical), 1999, vol.
54, pp. M370--M376
Footnotes
[1] Does religious attendance prolong survival? HG. Koenig,
JC. Hays, DB. Larson, et al., Journals of Gerontology (Medical),
1999, vol. 54, pp. M370--M376
|