| |
Stem cells are a wonderful potential source of cells for scientists looking
to clone animals-but the clones produced from those stem cells are not
as alike as clones should be.
In the July 6, 2001, issue of Science, Professors Rudolph Jaenisch and
Ryuzo Yanagimachi reported on their successful cloning of a population
of mice from stem cells. They were able to produce a population of mice
from stem cells that were, as expected, genetically identical. And indeed,
the mice looked exactly alike. But the mice harbored a number of different
genetic abnormalities. Which genes were turned on and active and which
were dormant differed from mouse to mouse, or clone to clone.
The scientists looked carefully at the clones and at the stem cells from
which they had arisen. They discovered that stem cells that should theoretically
have been identical already showed variability in terms of what genes
were turned off. In other words, they were already demonstrating the differentiation,
at least on a molecular level, that the offspring of those stem cells
would show. Put another way, these results suggest that mice stem cells
do not stay pluripotent, or able to produce a mouse cell of any type,
for as long as scientists have believed. This has serious implications
for research into human stem cells and their potential.
If human stem cells are as unstable as mouse stem cells, then the potential
of human stem cell research might not be as encouraging as scientists
have hoped. President Bush's decision to permit stem cell research on
existing cell lines, but not to permit new lines to be developed might
be far more limiting than was realized. If the 64 cell lines described
in the President's decision (and there are scientists who dispute that
number, worrying it is too optimistic) are like the mouse cell lines,
and already committed to becoming one type of cell, their potential is
less than had been believed. Scientists may need to start multiple other
stem cell lines in order to produce the sort of cells they hope to use,
such as healthy heart, nerve or blood cells.
If the embryonic human stem cells in existing lines approved by the President
are unstable, scientists may ask that the President and Congress revisit
the issue. Alternatively, they might focus on adult stem cells, and hope
that these cells show the therapeutic promise that embryonic stem cells
seem to show.
|
|