|
It's Not Which Diet, It's How You Diet
Summarized
by Robert W. Griffith, MD February 25, 2005
Introduction
During the last two years a battle has raged between
the Atkins (low-carb) diet and its rivals - low-fat and other
approaches. The longest clinical study comparing low-carb and
low-fat lasted 6 months, and was inconclusive. Given the role that
faddism, rather than science, plays in the choice of diets, a
comparison of the actual success of such diets over a longer period
is overdue. Now the results of such a study have been reported in
the Journal of the American Medical Association.
What was done
Overweight or obese adults living in the Boston area
were recruited. They were known to have high blood pressure,
abnormal blood lipids, or raised blood sugar levels, so that weight
loss was desirable from a medical point of view.
The participants were randomly allocated to one of
four diets:
- Dr Atkins diet (low-carbohydrate: maximum 20 gm daily
initially, increasing to 50 gm daily)
- Zone (macronutrient balance with a carbohydrate-fat-protein
ratio 40-30-30)
- Weight Watchers (counting calories to achieve between 1,200
and 1,600 kcal daily)
- Ornish (low-fat: vegetarian, with less than 10% of energy from
fat)
Dietary advice was given for the first two months;
after this time, participants chose their own level of adherence to
the recommended diet. They were expected to exercise at least 60
minutes a week, and they had to complete food intake records for 3
consecutive days at intervals during the 1-year study period.
Exams done during the study included body weight,
blood pressure, lipid profiles (total-, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol,
triglycerides), fasting blood sugar, and C-reactive protein
(CRP).
What the study showed
There were 40 participants in each diet group - half
of them were men, half women. Their ages ranged from 22 to 72, and
their average body mass index (BMI) was 35 (ranging from 27 to
42).
A disappointingly small number of participants
completed the 1-year study - 53% for Dr Atkins diet, 65% for Zone,
65% for Weight Watchers, and 50% for Ornish. In assessing the
results of dieting, it was assumed that those who didn't complete
the study had zero change from baseline.
For the completers, after 1 year there was an average
loss of 2.1 kg (4.6 lb) for Atkins, 3.2 kg (7.1 lb) for Zone, 3.2
(6.6 lb) for Weight Watchers, and 3.3 kg (7.3 lb) for Ornish. About
10% of the participants lost more than 10% of their body weight.
There was no significant difference between the four groups.
There were no significant effects on blood pressure or
fasting blood sugar, but the ratio of low- to high-density
lipoprotein was reduced (a beneficial change) with all four diets,
by about 10%.
The amount of individual weight lost was, not
surprisingly, linked to the degree of adherence to diet, but also to
reduction in CRP blood levels and insulin levels. Here, too, there
were no differences between the effects of the four diets.
What this means
This study shows that there is little difference
between four different types of diet - low-carb, balanced
carb-protein-fat, counting calories, and low-fat. All four had a
high (over 50%) drop-out rate, and produced only moderate weight
loss and cardiac risk reduction.
It's obvious that sticking with a diet will achieve a
better result in both weight reduction and lessened cardiac risk
factors. No single diet was better than another in these respects,
or more effective than another. So, forget the latest fad diet.
Instead of spending time and money trying to determine which diet is
the right one, you should start one that you believe you can stick
to - and then stick to it!
Source
- Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone
diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction.
ML. Dansinger, JA. Gleason, JL. Griffith, et
al., JAMA, 2005, vol. 293, pp. 43--53
Related Links
In the Battle Against Weight, It's All About
Maintenance
Moderate-Fat Diets for Weight Loss?
Putting Low-Carb Diets to the Test
Dr. Irene's Five Pitfalls of Dieting
Please take a moment to
give us your comments. For questions about Health matters you may
check our "Questions
& Answers" Portal and Service.

|